+1 on the idea in general, obviously there's a few more details to work out yet. I have some similar concerns to Cédric but I guess we can address those as we go.
Cheers, Paul. On Mon, Sep 25, 2017 at 11:08 PM, Andres Almiray <aalmi...@gmail.com> wrote: > BTW, I met with a couple of SonarSource engineers last week in Geneva > during a presentation at Geneva JUG. > The topic of code coverage with JaCoCo and Groovy came up. They told me a > feature such as the one discussed in this thread would help them greatly in > getting better code coverage numbers. > > Cheers, > Andres > > ------------------------------------------- > Java Champion; Groovy Enthusiast > http://andresalmiray.com > http://www.linkedin.com/in/aalmiray > -- > What goes up, must come down. Ask any system administrator. > There are 10 types of people in the world: Those who understand binary, > and those who don't. > To understand recursion, we must first understand recursion. > > On Tue, Sep 12, 2017 at 5:01 PM, Andres Almiray <aalmi...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> You hit the nail right on the head Jochen wrt synthetic methods. And as >> you correctly pointed out, not all transformations need to be updated right >> away. I wanted to lay out a set of tasks we must take into consideration >> should this feature be accepted. >> >> Cheers, >> Andres >> >> ------------------------------------------- >> Java Champion; Groovy Enthusiast >> http://andresalmiray.com >> http://www.linkedin.com/in/aalmiray >> -- >> What goes up, must come down. Ask any system administrator. >> There are 10 types of people in the world: Those who understand binary, >> and those who don't. >> To understand recursion, we must first understand recursion. >> >> On Sun, Sep 10, 2017 at 8:18 PM, Jochen Theodorou <blackd...@gmx.org> >> wrote: >> >>> On 08.09.2017 15:04, Andres Almiray wrote: >>> >>>> Unfortunately that annotation is coming in JDK9. We'll need something >>>> that can be used with JDK7 >>>> >>> >>> actually that would not be a problem. If the annotation is not found it >>> is ignored by the java compiler. The source retention policy though is a >>> very good reason not to use it. So we have to roll our own. >>> >>> I am +1 on the idea in general.... doesn´t mean all transforms have to >>> do it right away. >>> >>> bye Jochen >>> >>> >>> >> >
