I don't find any evidence of `module-info` file on `master` or 2.6.X. On the other hand, we have the ASM module-info file bundled, because we repackage. This is a mistake that needs to be fixed. So, false alarm, Daniel: WE didn't add a module-info file: a dependency of ours, ASM, has one, and when we create our jars it should be removed.
2017-11-20 8:28 GMT+01:00 Cédric Champeau <[email protected]>: > We should remove it: it doesn't make sense to have a module info at this > point, when we don't even know what we require, export, and when all of our > dependencies are not modules. And I'm not talking about our different > artifacts. If this was an experiment, it shouldn't have landed on master. > It will cause more harm than anything else if people try Groovy as a module. > > > 2017-11-20 8:20 GMT+01:00 Daniel Sun <[email protected]>: > >> Hi Cédric, >> >> I do not know who contributed the module-info, which seems to exist >> for a long time. >> >> Cheers, >> Daniel.Sun >> >> >> >> -- >> Sent from: http://groovy.329449.n5.nabble.com/Groovy-Dev-f372993.html >> > >
