This is the best way from IDE perspective. —
Daniil Ovchinnikov JetBrains jetbrains.com “Drive to develop" > On 14 Dec 2017, at 01:03, Nathan Harvey <[email protected]> wrote: > > In Java, methods and fields use package scope by default. In Groovy, they > use public. In order to make something package scope, you have to use the > @PackageScope annotation. This makes code look a bit messy but also doesn't > seem very intuitive. What if the "package" keyword was able to be applied, > in exactly the same way as "public" and "private" are? > > Example: > package void foo() {} > > > > -- > Sent from: http://groovy.329449.n5.nabble.com/Groovy-Dev-f372993.html
