Hi Daniel, was just trying to be sympathetic (in a joking way), since your suggestions currently seem to get rejected (including by me) quite quickly. Also, if a new syntax element raises least surprise / backward compatibility / breaking change concerns, Groovy 3.0 seems like the best place to suggest them... :-) Cheers,mg
-------- Ursprüngliche Nachricht --------Von: "Daniel.Sun" <sun...@apache.org> Datum: 18.03.18 06:15 (GMT+01:00) An: d...@groovy.incubator.apache.org Betreff: Re: [GEP]Lazy evaluation for Groovy 3 Hi mg, I am not going to add new syntax to groovy 3.0 as much as possible. Enhancing groovy language feature is just one of my hobbies. As you know, implementing language features will cost much time, but we are all quite busy in our own job and family :-) Cheers, Daniel.Sun -- Sent from: http://groovy.329449.n5.nabble.com/Groovy-Dev-f372993.html
