Yeah. Doesn't prevent us from having a quick 4.0 with module revamp if we're extremely good :)
Le mar. 22 mai 2018 à 13:29, Jesper Steen Møller <jes...@selskabet.org> a écrit : > And postpone module revamp? > > -Jesper > > On 22 May 2018, at 13.27, Cédric Champeau <cedric.champ...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > I think we should slim down what Groovy 3 is, make it Parrot + JDK 8 > basically. > > Le mar. 22 mai 2018 à 13:22, Paul King <pa...@asert.com.au> a écrit : > >> The question is really (most of) Parrot on JDK7+ or Parrot on JDK8+ >> sooner. >> >> >> On Tue, May 22, 2018 at 7:55 PM, Daniel.Sun <sun...@apache.org> wrote: >> >>> As a user, if you ask me whether I need the Parrot or not, my answer will >>> always be yes even if I seldom use it ;-) >>> >>> Cheers, >>> Daniel.Sun >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Sent from: http://groovy.329449.n5.nabble.com/Groovy-Dev-f372993.html >>> >> >> >
