On Wed, Sep 5, 2018 at 3:24 AM Daniil Ovchinnikov < [email protected]> wrote:
> Same as someObject?.getAt(x:y) > That would be the right mapping but we don't have any getAt(Map) support at the moment - well apart from the ClassConstant constructor short-hand being discussed.. > > > On 4 Sep 2018, at 20:23, Daniel.Sun <[email protected]> wrote: > > OK. I wonder what semantic `somMap?[x:y]` should be @_@ > > Cheers, > Daniel.Sun > > > > > ----- > Daniel Sun > Apache Groovy committer > Blog: http://blog.sunlan.me > Twitter: @daniel_sun > > -- > Sent from: http://groovy.329449.n5.nabble.com/Groovy-Dev-f372993.html > > >
