Hi Paul,
> I'd be inclined to leave the current implementation for dynamic Groovy and
> have a native implementation just with @CS. That gives us some scope for
> leaving out some of those fields/methods.
Agreed. As Java interface can not contain all fields/methods generated
by groovy compiler, it's better to get rid of most of them.
In addition, I wish Jochen could give us more advice on the native
implementation.
Cheers,
Daniel.Sun
-----
Apache Groovy committer
Blog: http://blog.sunlan.me
Twitter: @daniel_sun
--
Sent from: http://groovy.329449.n5.nabble.com/Groovy-Dev-f372993.html
