+1 (binding)

Sent from my primitive tricorder

> On 27 Sep 2020, at 0:04, Remko Popma <remko.po...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> 
> +1 Remko
> 
>> On Sat, Sep 26, 2020 at 6:19 PM Paul King <pa...@asert.com.au> wrote:
>> 
>> Dear development community,
>> 
>> I am happy to start the VOTE thread for a Groovy 3.0.6 release!
>> 
>> This release includes 72 bug fixes/improvements as outlined in the changelog:
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12318123&version=12348621
>> 
>> Tag: 
>> https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=groovy.git;a=tag;h=refs/tags/GROOVY_3_0_6
>> Tag commit id: 6eb8bbbf62120a29cae04d3cdddf0e4e28954760
>> 
>> The artifacts to be voted on are located as follows (r41589).
>> Source release: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/groovy/3.0.6/sources
>> Convenience binaries: 
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/groovy/3.0.6/distribution
>> 
>> Release artifacts are signed with a key from the following file:
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/groovy/KEYS
>> 
>> Please vote on releasing this package as Apache Groovy 3.0.6.
>> 
>> Reminder on ASF release approval requirements for PMC members:
>> http://www.apache.org/legal/release-policy.html#release-approval
>> Hints on validating checksums/signatures (but replace md5sum with sha256sum):
>> https://www.apache.org/info/verification.html
>> 
>> The vote is open for the next 72 hours and passes if a majority of at least 
>> three +1 PMC votes are cast.
>> 
>> [ ] +1 Release Apache Groovy 3.0.6
>> [ ]  0 I don't have a strong opinion about this, but I assume it's ok
>> [ ] -1 Do not release Apache Groovy 3.0.6 because...
>> 
>> Here is my vote:
>> 
>> +1 (binding)
>> 

Reply via email to