Sorry folks, Daniel found an issue with groovysh (just in 4.0.3). We
haven't thought of any workarounds that could be used to fix it to
still make it usable, so I will cancel this vote and re-roll the
release later today.

Cheers, Paul.

On Sun, May 29, 2022 at 2:25 PM Paul King <pa...@asert.com.au> wrote:
>
> Dear development community,
>
> I am happy to start the VOTE thread for a Groovy 4.0.3 release!
>
> This release includes 40 bug fixes/improvements as outlined in the changelog:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12318123&version=12351650
>
> Tag: 
> https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=groovy.git;a=tag;h=refs/tags/GROOVY_4_0_3
> Tag commit id: 7d1634595502170593da9cca3120c158867dfecf
>
> The artifacts to be voted on are located as follows (r54775).
> Source release: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/groovy/4.0.3/sources
> Convenience binaries:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/groovy/4.0.3/distribution
>
> Release artifacts are signed with a key from the following file:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/groovy/KEYS
>
> Please vote on releasing this package as Apache Groovy 4.0.3.
>
> Reminder on ASF release approval requirements for PMC members:
> http://www.apache.org/legal/release-policy.html#release-approval
> Hints on validating checksums/signatures (but replace md5sum with sha256sum):
> https://www.apache.org/info/verification.html
>
> The vote is open for the next 72 hours and passes if a majority of at
> least three +1 PMC votes are cast.
>
> [ ] +1 Release Apache Groovy 4.0.3
> [ ]  0 I don't have a strong opinion about this, but I assume it's ok
> [ ] -1 Do not release Apache Groovy 4.0.3 because...
>
> Here is my vote:
>
> +1 (binding)

Reply via email to