Paul, since you are already aware of it and expect this to be updated in the next release, that satisfies my needs.
The matter of the CVE being applicable has been muddied by the fact I am not the ultimate consumer and those users are outside of my visibility. I am also subject to an internal policy to address pretty much anything that gets flagged when possible. The choice to use groovy-binary and include a full "GROOVY_HOME" as a monolithic blob was made a long time ago and has become just another one of those things I am forced to live with as my project is maintained. Thank you very much for your reply, Jeff From: Paul King <pa...@asert.com.au> Date: Tuesday, April 25, 2023 at 6:11 AM To: dev@groovy.apache.org <dev@groovy.apache.org>, Jeffrey Adamson <jeffrey.adam...@hcl.com> Subject: Re: Bump Jackson dependency to 2.15.0 [CAUTION: This Email is from outside the Organization. Unless you trust the sender, Don’t click links or open attachments as it may be a Phishing email, which can steal your Information and compromise your Computer.] Hi Jeffrey, The dependencyUpdate task in the build is already flagging that dependency as needing updating. We are prompted by dependabot for some of our dependencies and others we check before doing a new release. So, there is no action needed but feel free to create a Jira task if you want better visibility (details on https://groovy.apache.org/). If you use a build system rather than groovy-binary, you can manually select updated Jackson or SnakeYAML dependencies with the current releases. If you are using groovy-binary but aren't parsing untrusted yaml source files, you can ignore the CVE flag as a false positive since it doesn't affect you. If you are using groovy-binary and are parsing untrusted yaml source files directly yourself, and you have turned on SnakeYAML security features yourself, you can ignore the CVE flag as a false positive since it doesn't affect you. Cheers, Paul. On Tue, Apr 25, 2023 at 7:47 AM Jeffrey Adamson via dev <dev@groovy.apache.org<mailto:dev@groovy.apache.org>> wrote: Similar to several historical issues, I would like to bring attention to the recent release of Jackson 2.15.0. It addresses a snakyaml update for CVE-2022-1471. In particular, I am currently using groovy-binary 3.0.17 and have a static analysis tool which is flagging that artifact with that CVE. Is there a preferred method for requesting this dependency be updated from 2.14.2 to 2.15.0? ::DISCLAIMER:: ________________________________ The contents of this e-mail and any attachment(s) are confidential and intended for the named recipient(s) only. E-mail transmission is not guaranteed to be secure or error-free as information could be intercepted, corrupted, lost, destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or may contain viruses in transmission. The e mail and its contents (with or without referred errors) shall therefore not attach any liability on the originator or HCL or its affiliates. Views or opinions, if any, presented in this email are solely those of the author and may not necessarily reflect the views or opinions of HCL or its affiliates. Any form of reproduction, dissemination, copying, disclosure, modification, distribution and / or publication of this message without the prior written consent of authorized representative of HCL is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error please delete it and notify the sender immediately. Before opening any email and/or attachments, please check them for viruses and other defects. ________________________________