There is an exception as part of ResolveVisitor#visitField, which leaves the class in a poor state. I will have a fix today.
In terms of 4.x, the original commit could be reverted as the bug fix is not that high priority. ________________________________ From: Jonny <jonteh1...@gmail.com> Sent: Monday, July 21, 2025 4:43 PM To: dev@groovy.apache.org <dev@groovy.apache.org> Subject: [EXT] Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Groovy 4.0.28 (Take 2) External Email: Use caution with links and attachments. You got it, Paul. GROOVY-11719<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GROOVY-11719__;!!GFN0sa3rsbfR8OLyAw!Z080OZm2KpECXoNtEGSKUN9FtnQwG6h3qExnoyWBiwYJInMuzJrueXrJNuL93Z1LYq7dd-w8hQDTksLQuG01VsU6Ug$> raised. Thanks! On Mon, Jul 21, 2025 at 4:35 PM Paul King <pa...@asert.com.au<mailto:pa...@asert.com.au>> wrote: Hi Jonny, Can you create a Jira ticket please? I don't plan to re-roll the release at this stage and we can fix it in the next release, but I'll await any further comments from Daniel/Eric who seem to be involved in earlier commits. Cheers, Paul. On Tue, Jul 22, 2025 at 7:08 AM Jonny <jonny...@apache.org<mailto:jonny...@apache.org>> wrote: I've traced the issue back to 33064484cc043bfb7c2ad75ee8fccbcbc6329b76. I think I've hit upon a fix<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://github.com/apache/groovy/pull/2270__;!!GFN0sa3rsbfR8OLyAw!Z080OZm2KpECXoNtEGSKUN9FtnQwG6h3qExnoyWBiwYJInMuzJrueXrJNuL93Z1LYq7dd-w8hQDTksLQuG1fYguDCg$>, pending review. Apologies for doing this on the release thread. Feel free to tell me that I'm out of order or just need to wait for the next release train. 😅 On Mon, Jul 21, 2025 at 3:38 PM Jonny <jonny...@apache.org<mailto:jonny...@apache.org>> wrote: Trying out the latest snapshot for 4.0.28, I'm encountering an error locally in my company's app's test suite. Based on the origin of the tests, this seems to be a regression of GROOVY-9526<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GROOVY-9526__;!!GFN0sa3rsbfR8OLyAw!Z080OZm2KpECXoNtEGSKUN9FtnQwG6h3qExnoyWBiwYJInMuzJrueXrJNuL93Z1LYq7dd-w8hQDTksLQuG2LrvKWRw$>, or at least in that vicinity. I've created a test (similar to the one we had in our app), which demonstrates the problem. https://github.com/apache/groovy/compare/GROOVY_4_0_X...jonnybot0:groovy:GROOVY-9526-regression-semantic-analysis-exception?expand=1<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://github.com/apache/groovy/compare/GROOVY_4_0_X...jonnybot0:groovy:GROOVY-9526-regression-semantic-analysis-exception?expand=1__;!!GFN0sa3rsbfR8OLyAw!Z080OZm2KpECXoNtEGSKUN9FtnQwG6h3qExnoyWBiwYJInMuzJrueXrJNuL93Z1LYq7dd-w8hQDTksLQuG3yO6Hs2Q$> This was not failing as recently as a week or two ago, so I suspect it's a relatively recent change. I'm open to being told that the semantics I'm using in this test are truly just invalid and unsupported, but I'll need some clearer idea why they are, as we may need to pass some guidance on to our users. Trying to raise this before release in case it's an easy fix. On Mon, Jul 21, 2025 at 1:24 PM Milles, Eric (TR Technology) via dev <dev@groovy.apache.org<mailto:dev@groovy.apache.org>> wrote: +1 (binding) ________________________________ From: Paul King <pa...@asert.com.au<mailto:pa...@asert.com.au>> Sent: Sunday, July 20, 2025 5:45 AM To: Groovy_Developers <dev@groovy.apache.org<mailto:dev@groovy.apache.org>> Subject: [EXT] [VOTE] Release Apache Groovy 4.0.28 (Take 2) External Email: Use caution with links and attachments. Dear development community, I am happy to start the VOTE thread for a Groovy 4.0.28 release! This release includes 19 bug fixes/improvements as outlined in the changelog: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12318123&version=12355971<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12318123&version=12355971__;!!GFN0sa3rsbfR8OLyAw!fvFuM-SRUpSaaLUHSSfvsP2YIgTH2TFKF_YrP6xqsqicrylv3_I8pvEkEVRyOcAlLLSjZ8JsbO95wFXtjuJpCA$> Tag: https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=groovy.git;a=tag;h=refs/tags/GROOVY_4_0_28<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=groovy.git;a=tag;h=refs*tags*GROOVY_4_0_28__;Ly8!!GFN0sa3rsbfR8OLyAw!fvFuM-SRUpSaaLUHSSfvsP2YIgTH2TFKF_YrP6xqsqicrylv3_I8pvEkEVRyOcAlLLSjZ8JsbO95wFW7LMEnig$> Tag commit id: bc6204944686858db9c6f195909f2258ad1d2a62 The artifacts to be voted on are located as follows (r78267). Source release: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/groovy/4.0.28/sources<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/groovy/4.0.28/sources__;!!GFN0sa3rsbfR8OLyAw!fvFuM-SRUpSaaLUHSSfvsP2YIgTH2TFKF_YrP6xqsqicrylv3_I8pvEkEVRyOcAlLLSjZ8JsbO95wFWv2nPY5Q$> Convenience binaries: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/groovy/4.0.28/distribution<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/groovy/4.0.28/distribution__;!!GFN0sa3rsbfR8OLyAw!fvFuM-SRUpSaaLUHSSfvsP2YIgTH2TFKF_YrP6xqsqicrylv3_I8pvEkEVRyOcAlLLSjZ8JsbO95wFUl-otI_w$> Release artifacts are signed with a key from the following file: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/groovy/KEYS<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/groovy/KEYS__;!!GFN0sa3rsbfR8OLyAw!fvFuM-SRUpSaaLUHSSfvsP2YIgTH2TFKF_YrP6xqsqicrylv3_I8pvEkEVRyOcAlLLSjZ8JsbO95wFW7lBIg0Q$> Please vote on releasing this package as Apache Groovy 4.0.28. Reminder on ASF release approval requirements for PMC members: http://www.apache.org/legal/release-policy.html#release-approval<https://urldefense.com/v3/__http://www.apache.org/legal/release-policy.html*release-approval__;Iw!!GFN0sa3rsbfR8OLyAw!fvFuM-SRUpSaaLUHSSfvsP2YIgTH2TFKF_YrP6xqsqicrylv3_I8pvEkEVRyOcAlLLSjZ8JsbO95wFUegGEwiw$> Hints on validating checksums/signatures (but replace md5sum with sha256sum): https://www.apache.org/info/verification.html<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://www.apache.org/info/verification.html__;!!GFN0sa3rsbfR8OLyAw!fvFuM-SRUpSaaLUHSSfvsP2YIgTH2TFKF_YrP6xqsqicrylv3_I8pvEkEVRyOcAlLLSjZ8JsbO95wFUZ9EcRCw$> The vote is open for the next 72 hours and passes if a majority of at least three +1 PMC votes are cast. [ ] +1 Release Apache Groovy 4.0.28 [ ] 0 I don't have a strong opinion about this, but I assume it's ok [ ] -1 Do not release Apache Groovy 4.0.28 because... Here is my vote: +1 (binding)
