We should be good now, resolutions updated in the initial thread. On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 12:23 PM, Bertrand Delacretaz < [email protected]> wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 12:13 PM, Guillaume Laforge <[email protected]> > wrote: > > ...charged with the evolution and maintenance of the Groovy programming > > language project, to enable developers to develop programs in Groovy as > an > > alternative and complementary approach to using the Java language on the > > Java platform.... > > Works but maybe "charged with the evolution and maintenance of the > Groovy programming language" would be good enough? > > >... There was a remark asking about committers, since we have committers > which > > aren't PMC members. > > So I figured I could just name them for reference and recognition. > > Should I remove them?.. > > I think so, such board resolutions only include PMC members. > > > ...Going forward (once we're happy with the wording), how should we > proceed > > with the changes? > > Is it just about mentioning that in the voting thread?.. > > Yes that's fine, I just wanted to avoid polluting that thread with > discussions. > > -Bertrand > -- Guillaume Laforge Apache Groovy committer & PMC member Product Ninja & Advocate at Restlet <http://restlet.com> Blog: http://glaforge.appspot.com/ Social: @glaforge <http://twitter.com/glaforge> / Google+ <https://plus.google.com/u/0/114130972232398734985/posts>
