On Thu, 2015-10-22 at 18:02 +0200, Cédric Champeau wrote: > Agreed. The only downside of this is that it is very painful to merge > PRs > on the GitHub Apache mirror, and even more painful to backport > changes.
OK, so Apache still doesn't really get Git and GitHub oriented workflows, it is still fundamentally a CVS/Subversion-based organization. What is the fundamental workflow problem that you feel is causing pain? Whatever it is, we must fix it, even if we have to subvert the current official "Apache Way" workflow. Having a workflow that works and is easy so that unpaid volunteers can actually achieve progress on the project, but nonetheless ends up with the Apache repository as mainline, is far, far, far more important than adherence to some particular quasi-political philosophy. -- Russel. ============================================================================= Dr Russel Winder t: +44 20 7585 2200 voip: sip:[email protected] 41 Buckmaster Road m: +44 7770 465 077 xmpp: [email protected] London SW11 1EN, UK w: www.russel.org.uk skype: russel_winder
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
