Hi,
just a friendly reminder that this problem is still relevant for us. If you have time to continue working here (https://github.com/apache/guacamole-server/pull/413), we would be very pleased. Thank you very much. -Martin On 2023/02/16 15:14:51 "Dyck, Martin (BITBW)" wrote: > Sounds great. > > > > After some tcpdumping the decisive paramenter should be TcpAckTimeout. > Because: > > I saw that after 5 seconds Guacamole sends a TCP keep alive, but after 9 > seconds Guacamole sends a FIN to end the RDP connection attempt. > > But as soon as the RDP connection is approved by an employee within the 9 > sec, the SPS sends an ACK and the RDP session starts well. > > > > - Martin > > > > > > On 2023/02/16 12:21:16 Nick Couchman wrote: > > > > > [cid:audit_bf_rz_21_DE_RGB_65712845-2146-4396-8f42-bcd2b1e8317e11.jpg] > > [cid:audit_bf_rz_21_DE_RGB_65712845-2146-4396-8f42-bcd2b1e8317e11.jpg] On Thu, Feb 16, 2023 at 2:07 AM Dyck, Martin (BITBW) > > > <ma...@bitbw.bwl.de<mailto:ma...@bitbw.bwl.de>>> wrote: > > > > > > > > Hi Nick, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > thank you very much for the quick reply. That sounds promising. > > > > > > > > I have seen your pull request #413. So can we expect in the next > > > guacamole release a way to modify the TcpAckTimeout? That would be > > > gorgeous! > > > > > > > > > > Yeah, your e-mail prompted me to go re-visit that Jira issue > > > (https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GUACAMOLE-600) and see if I > > > could make some progress on it. RDP was pretty easy to knock out - > > > assuming it actually works, we'll see - and I'll work through SSH and > > > Telnet, as well. VNC I'm not sure about at the moment. > > > > > > Another thing to note is that the source code for FreeRDP on Github > > > actually contains two parameters - TcpAckTimeout and > > > TcpConnectTimeout. My understanding is that the first one, > > > TcpAckTimeout, is the timeout for actually getting an initial > > > acknowledgement from the server that it is alive. TcpConnectTimeout is > > > likely the timeout between getting the acknowledgement that the server > > > is alive and when the connection is considered established. However, > > > checking my FreeRDP headers on my EL8 development system, > > > TcpConnectTimeout is not present, so I'm guessing this was added much > > > more recently. Ultimately we can probably support both, we'll just > > > have to check for that support in the FreeRDP library at build time > > > and enable it if it exists. All that to say - it isn't clear to me > > > which one is actually going to be of use to you. > > > > > > -Nick > > > >
