Thanks Mike and Nick. Another question, would it be possible to use WOL, even when in Connection Groups? --- Emerson
Em qua., 6 de nov. de 2024 às 16:10, Steven Barnhart < [email protected]> escreveu: > *To say "the connection groups aren't balancing" is not accurate - they > dobalance, but there is currently no mechanism for checking the state of > ahost to see if it is up before assigning that host to a user and > attemptingto connect.* > > Got it. Could it perhaps be more "random"? In my experience, even without > the "session affinity," and a group of connections users seem to always > connect to the same broken one. > > Steve > > > On Wed, Nov 6, 2024 at 1:40 PM Nick Couchman <[email protected]> wrote: > > > On Wed, Nov 6, 2024 at 1:30 PM Steven Barnhart <[email protected] > > > > wrote: > > > > > This has been our experience at least lately as well. The connection > > groups > > > aren’t balancing. > > > > > > > > To say "the connection groups aren't balancing" is not accurate - they do > > balance, but there is currently no mechanism for checking the state of a > > host to see if it is up before assigning that host to a user and > attempting > > to connect. > > > > > > > Steve > > > > > > > > > On Wed, Nov 6, 2024 at 1:28 PM <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > Hello everyone. > > > > > > > > My scenario. > > > > > > > > I have a Connection group, set up as load balance, with 10 machines. > > Due > > > to > > > > pay-per-use issues, only 5 are turned on at any given time. > > > > > > > > When a user connects, he/she receives a machine that is turned off. > > > > > > > > At this point, he/she enters an error loop. > > > > > > > > My question: is there any configuration that can set that when > > connecting > > > > to a machine with this error loop, it is redirected to the next > machine > > > in > > > > the connection group, until it finds a machine that is available. > > > > > > > > > > > At the moment, no. But there should be :-). > > > > -Nick > > >
