Yes, that would be my current opinion as well. FYI I have written down my thoughts of scalability improvements here: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Fud5zSFuKDAEz3E8T59ldZtg1H-IMx2CQGbn_bib_eA/edit Everybody with the link can edit the doc, so feel free adding your ideas.
2012/10/22 Edward J. Yoon <edwardy...@apache.org> > I think we can release current trunk as a Hama 0.6. At least, I had > confirmed that 2 Racks hama cluster can crunch 1 billion edges graph. > Many of the currently opened issues for 0.6 are pretty tricky > problems. > > WDYT, Thomas? > > On Mon, Oct 22, 2012 at 4:51 PM, Thomas Jungblut <tjungb...@apache.org> > wrote: > > Just a quick question: > > > > Should we cut the scalability improvements (messaging + graph) for the > next > > release? > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HAMA-644 > > > > I feel like they take more time to clearly think about what we need to > do, > > because it requires digging through various abstraction levels > (messaging, > > fault tolerance). > > Anyone want to volunteer to help with writing down specifications and > > planning them? Thanks in advance. > > > > -- > Best Regards, Edward J. Yoon > @eddieyoon >
