Hi Yexi,

sorry for the late reply, I think we can improve a bit our ML API by adding
(for example) generics to Functions, move regression.CostFunction interface
to math or remove it as some functions in math are themselves cost
functions, change MLP package name from perception to perceptron, this kind
of small things that may result (IMHO) in a more readable and user friendly
API.

My 2 cents,
Tommaso




2013/7/21 Yexi Jiang <[email protected]>

> Hi, Tommaso,
>
> For the machine learning module, what kind of refactoring do you think is
> necessary?
>
> Regards,
> Yexi
>
>
> 2013/7/21 Edward J. Yoon <[email protected]>
>
> > Additionally, Queue is also one of big issues.
> >
> > On Sun, Jul 21, 2013 at 8:55 PM, Tommaso Teofili
> > <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > Hi Edward,
> > >
> > > I'm still quite unsure about the status of FT so it may be worth doing
> > some
> > > work to make sure that is fully working (but it may be just me).
> > > Also vertex storage in graph package should be improved.
> > > Then I'd say some refactoring of machine learning module APIs together
> > with
> > > addition of "Collaborative Filtering"  (and eventually some other
> > > algorithms, but I'm still unsure there).
> > >
> > > My 2 cents,
> > > Tommaso
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > 2013/7/19 Edward J. Yoon <[email protected]>
> > >
> > >> Hi all,
> > >>
> > >> Once HAMA-742 is done, users will be able to install a Hama cluster on
> > >> existing Hadoop 1.x and new Hadoop 2.x without issues.
> > >>
> > >> I think urgent tasks are finished, now it's time to discuss about the
> > >> future roadmap Hama 0.7 and begin enhancement work.
> > >>
> > >> Please feel free to voice your opinions.
> > >>
> > >> Thanks.
> > >>
> > >> --
> > >> Best Regards, Edward J. Yoon
> > >> @eddieyoon
> > >>
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Best Regards, Edward J. Yoon
> > @eddieyoon
> >
>
>
>
> --
> ------
> Yexi Jiang,
> ECS 251,  [email protected]
> School of Computer and Information Science,
> Florida International University
> Homepage: http://users.cis.fiu.edu/~yjian004/
>

Reply via email to