[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HAMA-783?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13862059#comment-13862059
]
Hudson commented on HAMA-783:
-----------------------------
SUCCESS: Integrated in Hama-Nightly-for-Hadoop-1.x #1140 (See
[https://builds.apache.org/job/Hama-Nightly-for-Hadoop-1.x/1140/])
HAMA-783: Improvement of ListVerticesInfo (edwardyoon: rev 1555059)
* /hama/trunk/graph/src/main/java/org/apache/hama/graph/ListVerticesInfo.java
HAMA-783: Efficient InMemory Storage for Vertices (edwardyoon: rev 1555020)
* /hama/trunk/examples/src/main/java/org/apache/hama/examples/SSSP.java
* /hama/trunk/graph/src/main/java/org/apache/hama/graph/DiskVerticesInfo.java
* /hama/trunk/graph/src/main/java/org/apache/hama/graph/GraphJobRunner.java
* /hama/trunk/graph/src/main/java/org/apache/hama/graph/IDSkippingIterator.java
* /hama/trunk/graph/src/main/java/org/apache/hama/graph/ListVerticesInfo.java
* /hama/trunk/graph/src/main/java/org/apache/hama/graph/OffHeapVerticesInfo.java
* /hama/trunk/graph/src/main/java/org/apache/hama/graph/Vertex.java
* /hama/trunk/graph/src/main/java/org/apache/hama/graph/VertexInterface.java
* /hama/trunk/graph/src/main/java/org/apache/hama/graph/VerticesInfo.java
*
/hama/trunk/graph/src/test/java/org/apache/hama/graph/TestDiskVerticesInfo.java
*
/hama/trunk/graph/src/test/java/org/apache/hama/graph/TestOffHeapVerticesInfo.java
*
/hama/trunk/ml/src/main/java/org/apache/hama/ml/semiclustering/SemiClusteringVertex.java
> Efficient InMemory Storage for Vertices
> ---------------------------------------
>
> Key: HAMA-783
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HAMA-783
> Project: Hama
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: graph
> Reporter: Edward J. Yoon
> Assignee: Edward J. Yoon
> Fix For: 0.7.0
>
> Attachments: patch.txt
>
>
> Currently there are ListVerticesInfo, DiskVerticesInfo and DirectMemory, but
> I personally think we have to do a big re-design of the vertices storage and
> graph job runner.
> Actually, the size of split is not so great. Maybe, 60 ~ 200MB. Hence, I
> don't think DiskVerticesInfo will be really helpful. Instead, we can use the
> Serialization like Spark.
> Update:
> 1) We also need to consider the checkpointing for Fault Tolerance,
> periodically.
> 2) If DiskVerticesInfo shows good performance, we can use just the
> DiskVerticesInfo.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.1.5#6160)