0.6.4 or 0.7.0, Both are OK to me. Just FYI,
The memory efficiency has been significantly (almost x2-3) improved by runtime message serialization and compression. See https://wiki.apache.org/hama/Benchmarks#PageRank_Performance_0.7.0-SNAPSHOT_vs_0.6.3 (I'll attach more benchmarks and comparisons with other systems result soon). And, we've fixed many bugs. e.g., K-Means, NeuralNetwork, SemiClustering, Graph's Combiners HAMA-857. According to my personal evaluations, current system is fairly respectable. As I mentioned before, I believe we should stick to in-memory style since the today's machines can be equipped with up to 128 GB. Disk (or disk hybrid) based queue is a optional, not a must-have. Once we release this one, we finally might want to focus on below issues: * Fault tolerant job processing (checkpoint recovery) * Support GPUs and InfiniBand Then, I think we can release version 1.0. On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 8:44 PM, Tommaso Teofili <[email protected]> wrote: > Would you cut 0.7 or 0.6.4 ? > I'd go with 0.6.4 as I think the next minor version change should be due to > significant feature additions / changes and / or stability / scalability > improvements. > > Regards, > Tommaso > > > 2014-02-24 8:47 GMT+01:00 Edward J. Yoon <[email protected]>: > >> Hi all, >> >> I plan on cutting a release next week. If you have some opinions, Pls feel >> free to comment here. >> >> Sent from my iPhone -- Edward J. Yoon (@eddieyoon) Chief Executive Officer DataSayer, Inc.
