[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HAMA-568?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13932781#comment-13932781
]
Hudson commented on HAMA-568:
-----------------------------
SUCCESS: Integrated in Hama-Nightly-for-Hadoop-2.x #204 (See
[https://builds.apache.org/job/Hama-Nightly-for-Hadoop-2.x/204/])
HAMA-568: Add faster synchronized collections for message queues (edwardyoon:
rev 1576554)
* /hama/trunk/CHANGES.txt
*
/hama/trunk/core/src/main/java/org/apache/hama/bsp/message/queue/MemoryQueue.java
*
/hama/trunk/core/src/main/java/org/apache/hama/bsp/message/queue/SingleLockQueue.java
*
/hama/trunk/core/src/main/java/org/apache/hama/bsp/message/queue/SortedMemoryQueue.java
> Add faster synchronized collections for message queues
> ------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HAMA-568
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HAMA-568
> Project: Hama
> Issue Type: Sub-task
> Reporter: Thomas Jungblut
> Assignee: Edward J. Yoon
> Fix For: 0.7.0
>
> Attachments: HAMA-568.patch, HAMA-568_1.patch, HAMA-568_2.patch
>
>
> Currently the synchronized messaging (accessed concurrently via RPC) is done
> with a single mutex object. See org.apache.hama.bsp.message.SynchronizedQueue.
> This can be improved for memory queue by adding the ConcurrentLinkedQueue
> from Java since it has higher throughput.
> Needless to say, we should add some custom synchronized version of a queue,
> maybe through a factory class in the normal version.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2#6252)
