I think graph is a pretty fine name, it'easy to understand it's Hama applied to graphs, for 'ml' maybe it's a bit too short so ml may mean anything even if I don't think 'mach' improves that.
Regards, Tommaso 2014-04-13 17:01 GMT+02:00 Yexi Jiang <yexiji...@gmail.com>: > It seems that the old names are better than the new names. > > > 2014-04-13 8:10 GMT-04:00 Andronidis Anastasios <andronat_...@hotmail.com > >: > > > hi, > > > > sorry but i don't understand what the new names mean. > > > > what is a b-graph? mach? > > > > kindly, > > anastasis > > > > On 13 Απρ 2014, at 1:54 μ.μ., Edward J. Yoon <edwardy...@apache.org> > > wrote: > > > > > Because they are too ambiguous and unmemorable. > > > > > > On Sun, Apr 13, 2014 at 8:25 PM, Tommaso Teofili > > > <tommaso.teof...@gmail.com> wrote: > > >> why? > > >> > > >> Tommaso > > >> > > >> > > >> 2014-04-13 12:57 GMT+02:00 Edward J. Yoon <edwardy...@apache.org>: > > >> > > >>> I propose that we rename the graph and ml modules: > > >>> > > >>> 1. Hama Graph -> B-Graph > > >>> 2. Hama ML -> Mach > > >>> > > >>> WDYT? > > >>> > > >>> -- > > >>> Edward J. Yoon (@eddieyoon) > > >>> Chief Executive Officer > > >>> DataSayer Co., Ltd. > > >>> > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > Edward J. Yoon (@eddieyoon) > > > Chief Executive Officer > > > DataSayer Co., Ltd. > > > > > > > -- > ------ > Yexi Jiang, > ECS 251, yjian...@cs.fiu.edu > School of Computer and Information Science, > Florida International University > Homepage: http://users.cis.fiu.edu/~yjian004/ >
