[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HAMA-913?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14089106#comment-14089106
]
Edward J. Yoon commented on HAMA-913:
-------------------------------------
Please see also, https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AVRO-405
and I've chatted with netty guys.
[19:07] <edyoon> Hello. someone uploaded a netty-based asynchronous RPC
implementation for Apache Hama (Hama is a message-passing based parallel
computing framework). Internally, we bundle the messages to reduce the RPC
overhead, so I want to know whether "netty-based asynchronous RPC
implementation" is fit for transferring large size of messages?
[19:08] <@normanm> edyoon yes it is
[19:08] <@normanm> edyoon for example facebook is using it for nifty which is a
thrift server on top of netty
[19:08] <@normanm> I guess the use case is kind of the same
> Adding Implementation of RPC
> ----------------------------
>
> Key: HAMA-913
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HAMA-913
> Project: Hama
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: bsp core
> Affects Versions: 0.6.4
> Reporter: ByungSeok Min
> Priority: Minor
> Labels: core, messaging, netty
> Fix For: 0.7.0
>
> Attachments: HAMA-913-v01.patch, HAMA-913-v02.patch,
> HAMA-913-v03.patch
>
>
> The current RPC server code is too complex and there are some unnecessary code
> So, It seems good to add implementation of RPC such as netty
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2#6252)
