Sorry - yes, you are right.
Other things :
1) When running on x86_64 (where we have bugs), I noticed that the
kernel tests don't run to completion on failure. How can we get it to
do that? It would be nice to figure out what all the failures are.
Failfast is set to off. Maybe I have to run forkmode as whatever the
other value is. what is the other value?
2) Would it be hard to have an overall test report? Like :
JVMTI (jit) - PASSED
JVMTI (int) - PASSED
c-unit - PASSED
smoke (jit) - PASSED
smoke (int) - PASSED
kernel (jit) - PASSED
kernel (opt) - PASSED
kernel (int) - PASSED
Should be easy - maybe we just echo the result of each stage to a file
and print the result. I'll poke at that.
geir
Alexey Varlamov wrote:
2006/11/21, Geir Magnusson Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
I just ran full test suite on ubuntu 6 x86, after goosing the timeout
number by an order of magnitude (and committing it..)
But...
where did the jvmti tests go?
They should run by default as well
They do run, the first in order - so may be just scrolled high in console.
geir
Alexey Varlamov wrote:
> 2006/11/21, Geir Magnusson Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>>
>>
>> Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
>> >
>> >
>> > Alexey Varlamov wrote:
>> >> 2006/11/21, Gregory Shimansky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> >>> Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
>>
>> >
>> >> Generally I agree it is always better to discuss, and in fact
>> >> hesitated to commit with default forking set to "once" - but
decided
>> >> this is right thing to do rigth now. The current trend to make
drlvm
>> >> truly standard VM for harmony, recently Alexei even proclaimed 100%
>> >> HUT pass rate, neverthless drlvm is not yet reliable enough and we
>> >> should keep the momentum and face possible problems with open eyes.
>> >> Again, I'm sorry to bother you^H^H^H us VM guys, but believe
this is
>> >> neccessary evil now.
>> >
>> > The nicer way to do this is to introduce this change as an
option, and
>> > let people start using it...
>> >
>>
>> So it doesn't appear that I'm beating up on you :) I want to say
that i
>> do like some of these changes. very much, actually, such as the test
>> properties, and the summary info. And the fact that we have that
switch
>> and you just forgot to mention it... is great.
>>
>> It's just good to announce to people, to give them a heads-up and a
>> chance to respond.
>>
>> It's also easier if you describe the changes in prose, rather than
hope
>> someone has the time and wherewithal to grok the svn diff.
>
> Thank you Geir! And thanks to all who cared and dared to speak up.
> I see and I learn a lot.
>
> --
> Alexey
>
>>
>>
>> geir
>>
>
