I do not follow why we need serialization compatiblity here?
The j.l.Builder itself is not serializable, nor a Process
implementation for obvious reason - I don't think we should care about
env either.
--
Alexey
2006/11/23, Richard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Tony Wu wrote:
> I generated the golden file by RI and got the testcase[1] below failed
> on Harmony.
> In general, we should implement a class whose name/package is
> completely same as RI for serialization compatiblity, but the
> customized Map is not a public class.(i.e. I'm not able get the class
> name from spec.) Is it proper to print the name by getClass.getName()
> and follow RI here?
>
> [1]
> public void testSerializationCompatibility() throws Exception {
> ProcessBuilder pb = new ProcessBuilder("Arg1", "Arg2", "Arg3");
> Map<String, String> env = pb.environment();
> SerializationTest.verifyGolden(this, env);
> }
>
>
>
IMHO, we shall use the same class name.
--
Richard Liang
China Development Lab, IBM
