Why not just remove from the platforms you have, and ask others to
update (or not) platforms you don't have as appropriate?
geir
Tim Ellison wrote:
Alexei Zakharov wrote:
Hi,
So we just should choice what is better: to break sometimes tests run
or to
forget enable test(s) on some platforms.
Yesterday, when I was removing one of the beans tests from exclude
lists, I feel a bit uncomfortable while updating
exclude.linux.x86_64.xxx since I have no (easy) access to such systems
and had no plans to run tests on it. IMHO (in the perfect world) the
fact that I remove or add something from / to exclude.linux.x86_64
means I've at least ran tests for this platform and obtained some
result. So let's have a common list, it's easier to deal with it
psychologically. :-)
As for above question: +1 for being optimists, i.e. to remove the test
from common list if it passes on all platforms available to tester.
+1 (otherwise I'll share the psychotherapy costs with you :-)
Regards,
Tim
