Alexey Petrenko wrote:
2006/11/24, Tim Ellison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Alexey Petrenko wrote:
> 2006/11/13, Andrey Chernyshev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> Seems like we don't have any VM at the moment which would be really
>> using the hythr from classlib. Even IBM VME doesn't use the hythr. As
>> Tim wrote earlier, VME is using it's own threading library called
>> j9thr23 [1]. Does it differ a much from the hythr?
>
> Is that really so? Tim?
That is really so, and it does not differ greatly from hythr.
If it is really so then why IBM VME needs hythr in bin? Let's remove
it from there. Leave a stub in classlib to build with. And move hythr
for DRLVM to VM directory as for IBM VME.
Right - if the VMs are providing their own thread lib... why not?
geir
