That's a moot question ... GPF-ing is unacceptable known behavior.
I am not sure if we should guarantee the correct behavior in case of invalid system configuration, missing libraries, etc. Should we?
On 11/24/06, Tim Ellison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Oleg Khaschansky wrote: > Do you suggest to introduce the error handling for all the wrappers or > only for this one? If for all, do you think if it will affect the > performance? That's a moot question ... GPF-ing is unacceptable known behavior. > The only place is that native code :) I need some time to find out if > it is possible to get the tool which generated it to harmony. That's ok, I was just respecting the source file comment. Since we have what we have in harmony I'll edit it directly. Regards, Tim -- Tim Ellison ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) IBM Java technology centre, UK.
