Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
Paulex Yang wrote:
Mikhail Loenko wrote:
I'm ok with that timeline. We probably need goals for "dotted"
releases also (like 5.1 where we can improve for example performance)
I'm not sure, but I thought we can only release 5.0_01 if Sun didn't
have 5.1?
Why not?
There is a version of the spec, and a version of the implementation,
which are different.
If so, I prefer to Harmony 1.0(SE 5.0 compatible), 1.1(SE 5.0 compatible
with performance enhancement) just like what Geronmo does, rather than
5.0, 5.1, which is confusing.
geir
Thanks,
Mikhail
2006/11/27, Geir Magnusson Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
I noticed that I've said the following several times, and it's really
not for me to say, but for us to say.
Does anyone have a problem with the following "high-level" time line?
Mid 2007 : Java SE 5
End 2007 : Java SE 6 (meaning we have to start thinking about Java
SE 6
classlib changes...)
End 2008 : Java SE 7 (this really means "we'll do Java SE 7 when Sun
does Java SE 7...")
geir
--
Paulex Yang
China Software Development Lab
IBM
