Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote: > Yes, to be consistent. Because if vm.assert_dialog has anything to do > with a _dialog_ for _asserts_, we should keep with DRLVM tradition and > name it something only barely, tenuously similar. > > How about > > vm.checker_bannana
I'm good if you remove the vm prefix. The double-n is a nice touch. <g> Regards, Tim -- Tim Ellison ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) IBM Java technology centre, UK.
