Leo,
Could you please share more info about the problem?

Could you please name a test case which affects other test cases? I
have tried to check http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HARMONY-2249
but it doesn't contain any clue.

Why this test case cannot be fixed to clean environment on exit?
--
Thank you,
Alexei


On 11/29/06, Leo Li <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
 Anyway, using exec, the test is running in a standalone java program rather
than the normal junit test.:)

On 11/28/06, Stepan Mishura <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On 11/28/06, Leo Li wrote:
> >
> > OK. It will do in exec, but the style is a little different.:)
>
>
> Sorry, I didn't catch - what "different style" means here?
>
> Thanks,
> Stepan.
>
> And I also believe run most tests in one VM will save time.(Actually it
> > has been quite long currently.)
> > I just want to denote the tests that should run in seperate VM while
> > remaining the style of junit tests except some configurations. (Like
> > something in AOP and without intruding.)
> >
> >
> > On 11/28/06, Tim Ellison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > > Stepan Mishura wrote:
> > > > On 11/27/06, Leo Li wrote:
> > > >>
> > > >> Hi, all:
> > > >>     During fixing the bug of Harmony-2249, I found that the
> testcase
> > in
> > > >> one
> > > >> junit test file might lead to other fail in a different junit file.
> > > After
> > > >> digging into it, I am aware that testcase can influence the global
> > > state
> > > >> of
> > > >> a VM, for example, the resolution of class (both RI and Harmony
> have
> > > >> similar
> > > >> behavior). Although I changed the testcase as a workaround,  it is
> > not
> > > >> tested so thoroughly as I expected in order not to lead other tests
> > to
> > > >> fail.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > If a test's execution influence of VM state and this is critical for
> > > other
> > > > test then the test can fork VM (via Support_Exec.execJava()) and do
> > all
> > > > testing in the forked VM.
> > >
> > > +1 -- and this should be the exception, in general tests should put
> > > things back as they found them.  exec'ing a new Java is for those
> cases
> > > where you cannot do that.
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > > Tim
> > >
> > > --
> > >
> > > Tim Ellison ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
> > > IBM Java technology centre, UK.
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Leo Li
> > China Software Development Lab, IBM
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> Stepan Mishura
> Intel Middleware Products Division
>
>


--
Leo Li
China Software Development Lab, IBM




--
Thank you,
Alexei

Reply via email to