They need to benchmark computational part. Benchmarking with IO are much more complex and not obvious to interpret. BTW, IO implementation in classlib is highly inefficient, see HARMONY-2288. -- Ivan
On 11/29/06, Geir Magnusson Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Sergey Kuksenko wrote: > On 11/28/06, Geir Magnusson Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> Re specjbb2005 : >> >> No I/O? Concurrency? > > > No. > [SNIP] >> >> That means the clients are in the same VM. No sockets or such? > > > You are right. > No sockets, the clients are in the same VM. > [SNIP] >> >> without I/O > > > yes. > Well, I guess they are modeling a very secure application server - no data in or out :) [SNIP] >> >> Do you have an idea of what %-age of workload processing in the test >> suite is XML? >> > > Below is SUN's (server) distribution on SPECjbb2005 shown using profiler. > Garbage collection impact was not included into the data. > Also the distribution below is shown accurately to methods inlining. > > > > > impact > > spec.jbb.* classes > > 62.6% > > java.lang.* classes > > 9.2% > > java.math.* classes > > 6.8% > > XML classes > > 6.7% > > VM > > 7.4% > > java.util.* classes > > 3.9% > > UNKNOWN > > 3.4% > > Thanks - that's interesting information.
