Oleg Khaschansky wrote: >> The requirements on developers may be quite wide. I don't see a >> problem that a >> developer who works on awt has to have X11 installed. It seems to me >> quite a >> sane requirement. >> We provide *source*. It shall be a pain (actually no pain at all, >> Harmony is >> not the first package in Linux history) for those who create >> distributions to >> arrange all necessary libraries in place. > > You told that we are to do the following (correct me if I am wrong): > 1. Requre that system on which harmony is built have x11 > 2. Want people build harmony from sources instead of using binary packages > Then how you imagine headless support in awt, which is intended for > the configurations without x11 server installed?
Do you mean at runtime or build time? i.e. do you envisage a "headless build" which only allows you to build a headless implementation, or simply require that the code is capable of running headless by not requiring the x11 server at runtime. or both. Regards, Tim -- Tim Ellison ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) IBM Java technology centre, UK.
