Alexei Fedotov wrote:
+1
Though I don't think we should exclude tests without filing a
correspondent JIRA issue. The problem should be documented somewhere
so we wouldn't forget about it.
I agree, but the fact is that the exclude list is self-documentation of
sorts - this is a crystal-clear example of why I'm really not in favor
of annotation-based test organization, because you distribute this kind
of info in the source, rather than in one (or a few) cleanly readable
places.
That said, a JIRA would be nice too.
geir
On 12/4/06, Mikhail Loenko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
2006/12/4, Vladimir Ivanov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Alexei,
>
> seems, your compare tests runs for x86 and x86_64 platforms.
>
> Actually, we should compare the runs 215 and 228.
>
> In this context we did good progress :)
>
>
>
> By the way, it is OK to exclude failed tests for x86_64 platform
while these
> tests will be enabled?
I think yes. That was one of the reason for per platform exclude lists:
while the platform is being enabled we are seeking for regressions.
Thanks,
Mikhail
>
>
>
> Thanks, Vladimir
>
>
> On 12/4/06, Alexei Fedotov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Vladimir,
> >
> > It looks like a source tree wasn't changed:
> >
> > $ svn diff --old=https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > --new=https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> > Where could these crashes come from? Can the regression be triggered
> > by some change on CruiseControl side, eg changing fork mode to fork
> > once?
> >
> > --
> > Thank you,
> > Alexei
> >
>
>
