I mean does the tool itself uses the value of "Patch info" JIRA property (every JIRA has it) during generation of reports? Does the final report contain patch_available info?
Thanks, 2006/12/6, Ivaschenko, Aleksei V <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
It doesn't, because there is no patch available :) the contribution is not committed yet. Alexei Zakharov wrote: > >Does it make use of "patch_available"? It seems to be a very important >field for committers :) > >Regards, > >2006/12/6, Ivaschenko, Aleksei V <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >> Thanks! >> It's a good idea to classify classlib bugs by module names. >> I'll do that in next update. >> >> Tony Wu wrote: >> >Good job! >> >So many unresloved bugs. Seems there is a long way to go. >> >I have a suggestion but not the requirement. What about classify the >> >classlib related issuses by module name, accoding to the JIRA title. >> >You know, the title follows the format [classlib][modulename]Content. >> > >> >On 12/6/06, Ivaschenko, Aleksei V <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> wrote: >> >> Hi! >> >> >> >> I've updated scripts for generating indicators of unresolved Harmony >> >> bugs: >> >> >> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HARMONY-2359 >> >> >> >> Now scripts can generate separate indicators for "Classlib", "DRLVM", >> >> "VM" and "Contributions" Harmony components showing the proportions >> of >> >> their unresolved bugs by priority. Find the examples of indicators on >> >> wiki page: >> >> >> >> http://wiki.apache.org/harmony/Unresolved_Bugs_History > >-- >Alexei Zakharov, >Intel Enterprise Solutions Software Division Thanks, Aleksei.
-- Alexei Zakharov, Intel Enterprise Solutions Software Division
