On 12/6/06, Alexander Kleymenov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi Alexey, To answer your question it is needed to understand what is the problem you are questioning about? If the problem is as On 11/29/06, Alexei Fedotov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > detecting crashes during a test run then you are right. But if you meant On 12/1/06, Vladimir Ivanov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > generate 'crashed' result for test you are wrong.
No, my patch also generates some results for crashed tests :) These patches are implement the similar functionality but with different approach. Due to unexpected nature of crashes both of them will be useful. In the case when even no report file was created the second one is better. But if vm crashed after creation zero-length file the first one is better. Thanks, Vladimir
Thanks, Alexander On 12/5/06, Alexei Zakharov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi Alexander, > > But what is the difference between junit extension your attached to > HARMONY-2416 and Vladimir's work from HARMONY-2349? It seems it solves > the same problem. Am I wrong? > > Thanks, > > 2006/12/5, Alexander Kleymenov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > Hello, > > > > As a part of DRLVM regression testing infrastructure I've developped > > JVM crash handler. Please, look at it in HARMONY-2416 report [1]. More > > information can be found in corresponding mail thread [2]. > > > > Thank you, > > Alexander > > > > [1] http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HARMONY-2416 > > [2] http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/harmony-dev/200612.mbox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > -- > Alexei Zakharov, > Intel Enterprise Solutions Software Division >
