This sounds quite acceptable, we should turn these tests on.
On 12/6/06, Geir Magnusson Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Yes! Elena Semukhina wrote: > On 12/5/06, Rana Dasgupta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> How much total additional time would be needed to run the tests that are >> excluded for "slowness" only? > > > There are 11 tests marked as slow. They run about 30 sec in JIT mode. Only > one of them is rather slow: gc.Mark (~15 sec). > > I compared the whole run duration on linux (JIT + interpreter). > Currently 26 > tests run for about 3 min 30 sec. Adding 42 tests from exclude list > increases duration up to 11 minutes (1 min 40 sec for JIT). > > Is this time acceptable? > > Thanks, > Elena > > Thanks, >> Rana >> >> >> On 12/5/06, Elena Semukhina <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> > >> > We currently have more than 40 smoke tests in the exclude list. >> > I tried to run all of them on linux/Windows and found out that most of >> > them >> > stably pass. >> > Those of them which have been marked with the "slow" keyword don't >> > actually >> > run slow. They are not slower than an average smoke test. Only few of >> them >> > work about 10 seconds (comparing to 1-4 seconds duration of any other >> > test). >> > >> > Only 3 tests stably fail and about 5 tests fail intermittently. I've >> added >> > the details to the >> http://wiki.apache.org/harmony/DRLVMInternalTestspage. >> > I plan to file JIRA issues about failing tests and to gather more >> > statictics >> > on intermittent failures. >> > >> > Does anybody object to removing most tests from exclude lists and bring >> > them >> > back to runs? >> > >> > -- >> > Thanks, >> > Elena >> > >> > >> >> > >
