I'm not against work balancing system. I just have an opinion that the threads used for finalization should run with higher priority. I don't have strict motivation for this, just think that it will make us alike the RI. -- Ivan
On 12/11/06, Pavel Afremov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Did You mean high priority forever? Or tuned priority of finalizer thread? You wrote threads. How many threads You'd like to have? Pavel. On 12/11/06, Ivan Volosyuk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 12/11/06, Pavel Afremov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > 3. In Finalization system now there is Work Balance Mechanism > which > > tunes performance of finalization. When many finalizable object are > > allocated and queue for finalization isn't empty this mechanism increase > > performance of finalization (more detailed description see in dev > guide). I > > can't found usage of Work Balance Subsystem in this patch. Maybe it > would be > > better to use WBS instead high priority forever for finalizer thread. > > IMHO, I would prefer to have high priority finalizer threads. > -- > Ivan >
-- Ivan Intel Enterprise Solutions Software Division
