On 12/14/06, Alexei Zakharov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
That one? If you are talking about the problem mentioned in your
initial message
Sorry... we've agreed that the behaviour of SerialBlob.position(byte[],
long) is a bug in another thread. Yes, "This one" means the initial message
-- getByte(long, int) method. But seldom people reponsed this thread to
regard it as a bug. :)
> public void testGetBytesJI1() throws Exception {
> > byte[] buf = { 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 };
> > SerialBlob serialBlob = new SerialBlob(buf);
> > byte [] data = serialBlob.getBytes(2, 1);
> > assertEquals(1, data.length);
> > assertEquals(2, data[0]);
> > }
> > throws SerialException with message "Invalid arguments: position
cannot be
> > less that 1".
then +1 from me for following the spec since I don't understand RI's
behavior at all. Please note that even the exception message itself
contains typos :)
LOL, I just noticed "less that 1"...
Regards,
2006/12/13, Andrew Zhang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Hey guys,
>
> How about this one? It seems a bug of RI too.
>
> Any comments? Thanks!
>
> On 12/11/06, Andrew Zhang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Hi folks,
> > SerialBlob spec points out that getBytes(long position, int length)
should
> > throw SerialException if the given starting position is out of bounds.
But
> > RI also throws SerialException when the position is in the bound of
the
> > array in some other cases. Consider following code:
> >
> > public void testGetBytesJI1() throws Exception {
> > byte[] buf = { 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 };
> > SerialBlob serialBlob = new SerialBlob(buf);
> > byte [] data = serialBlob.getBytes(2, 1);
> > assertEquals(1, data.length);
> > assertEquals(2, data[0]);
> > }
> >
> > IMO, the starting position 2 and the length 1 are both valid. But RI
> > throws SerialException with message "Invalid arguments: position
cannot be
> > less that 1". Is it a bug of RI? Or did I missing something? Any
> > suggestions? Thanks in advance!
> >
> > --
> > Best regards,
> > Andrew Zhang
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Best regards,
> Andrew Zhang
>
>
--
Alexei Zakharov,
Intel ESSD
--
Best regards,
Andrew Zhang
