I've filed a non-bug-differences-from-RI JIRA Harmony-2723 for this issue.
Thanks!
On 12/14/06, Andrew Zhang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi guys,
I've filed jira Harmony-2708, and followed spec for position(byte[],
long) implementation.
Thanks!
On 12/14/06, Andrew Zhang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Cool. Since we all agreed to do exact search, I'll follow this way to
> implement position(byte[] pattern, long pos) in Harmony. :)
>
> On 12/13/06, Oleg Khaschansky <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote:
> >
> > > I wonder how Sun can release the code that is
> > > completely broken? This is strange.
> > Probably, SerialBlob.position(...) methods are not very popular.
> > Simply noone noticed that they are broken. And noone needs to get a
> > part of a BLOB into an array with getBytes, people tend to get the
> > whole array and it works fine.
> >
> > On 12/13/06, Alexei Zakharov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > It seems this is another RI's dark corner. The above tests look like
> >
> > > standard usage patterns for the position() method. Is there
> > something
> > > specific about them? I wonder how Sun can release the code that is
> > > completely broken? This is strange.
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > >
> > > 2006/12/13, Oleg Khaschansky < [EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > > > > BTW, what does the another version
> > > > > of position() method - position(Blob pattern, long start) -
> > return in
> > > > > these cases?
> > > > I tried the following:
> > > > byte[] buf = { 1,3,9,1,1,3,2,2,4,2,3,9,3,3 };
> > > > SerialBlob blob = new SerialBlob(buf);
> > > >
> > > > byte[] pattern = new byte[] { 1,2,3 };
> > > > SerialBlob blob2 = new SerialBlob(pattern);
> > > > long pos = blob.position(blob2, 1);
> > > > System.out.println(pos);
> > > > and, again, it returned 9. It seems like it does exactly the same
> > as
> > > > position(byte[] pattern, long start).
> > > >
> > > > Regarding its implementation, it's possible to simply get the byte
> >
> > > > array with pattern.getBytes(1, pattern.length()) and then use
> > > > position(byte[] pattern, long start) with the obtained byte array.
> >
> > > >
> > > > On 12/13/06, Alexei Zakharov < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > > Looks like the RI bug to me also. BTW, what does the another
> > version
> > > > > of position() method - position(Blob pattern, long start) -
> > return in
> > > > > these cases?
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks,
> > > > >
> > > > > 2006/12/13, Tim Ellison < [EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > > > > > Oleg Khaschansky wrote:
> > > > > > > I am not a guru, but my understanding is that RI behavior is
> > > > > > > errorneous. I'd say that from the client point of view BLOBs
> > are just
> > > > > > > byte arrays. I suggest to do exact search instead of
> > following RI.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Same for me -- looks like the right answer but don't claim
> > expert
> > > > > > knowledge in the area.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Alexei Zakharov,
> > > Intel ESSD
> > >
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Best regards,
> Andrew Zhang
--
Best regards,
Andrew Zhang
--
Best regards,
Andrew Zhang
