Tim Ellison wrote: > FYI, update done in repo r488259. > > Unfortunately it seems that Yoko M2 does not include an update to the > the RMI types, so to keep things clear there are now two Yoko dependency > directories reflecting the fact that we are using JARs from M1 and M2.
Is this something we should inform the Yoko dev team about? > Regards, > Tim > > Alexey Petrenko wrote: >> No objection from me too. >> M2 should increase japitools score for org.omg classes. >> >> SY, Alexey >> >> 2006/12/13, Tim Ellison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >>> Unless there are any objections I'll update the version of Yoko that we >>> take, from M1 to the M2 build that was published mid-November. >>> >>> Of course, I'll wait until after the snapshot is blessed. >>> >>> Regards, >>> Tim >>> -- Stefano.
