On 18 December 2006 at 20:16, "Stepan Mishura" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On 12/18/06, Mark Hindess wrote:
> >
> > On 18 December 2006 at 13:43, "Alexey Varlamov" wrote:
> > > Stepan,
> > >
> > > I thougth we agreed to drop "signed" prefix. See also comment in the
> > > depends.properties:
> > > --------------------
> > > # will the next person to update bcprov.jar please remove the "signed."
> > > # prefix from the bcprov.jar property
> > > bcprov.dir=${depends.jars}/bcprov-jdk15-134
> > > bcprov.jar=${bcprov.dir}/signed.bcprov.jar
> > > --------------------
> >
> > Indeed. The 'signed.' prefix was left when I removed the 'unsigning'
> > step that we needed a while back. I couldn't remove the prefix without
> > making unnecessary work for developers so I left it to be removed next
> > time developers had to fetch a new version.
>
>
> Mark, sorry about that. I forgot to remove the prefix in the last moment.
>
> BTW, what do you mean by saying "I couldn't remove the prefix without making
> unnecessary work for developers"?
Well, there was already a bcprov.jar which was the unsigned version
so that file already existed and would need to be removed so that the
signed version could be renamed (or downloaded by fetch-depends for new
developers). I suppose I could have done it in ant, but that would have
meant writing some code (quite a bit probably) that I/we would have
to remember to remove later. I thought just writing the comment was
easier.
Regards,
Mark.
> > > 2006/12/18, Stepan Mishura <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > > > On 12/14/06, Leo Li wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > Hi, all:
> > > > > When fixing the bug of Harmony-2678, I found Harmony fails to
> > get the
> > > > > AlgorithmParameters for the algorithm "OAEP" because of the
> > > > > signed.bcprov.jar used lacks a class called "
> > > > > org.bouncycastle.jce.provider.JDKAlgorithmParameters$OAEP ". But it
> > exist
> > > s
> > > > > in the latest release version of Bouncy Castle and I replace the
> > current
> > > > > used jar with bcprov-jdk15-134.jar and everything is OK.
> > > > > So shall we update the signed.bcprov.jar? If it is, I will give
> > a
> > > > > patch to the renew the make/depends.properties.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Hi Leo,
> > > >
> > > > I've applied your patch for upgrading version of Bounce Castle
> > provider
> > > > (from HARMONY-2678).
> > > >
> > > > Thanks,
> > > > Stepan.
> > > >
> >
> >
> >
>
> --
> Stepan Mishura
> Intel Enterprise Solutions Software Division
>
> ------=_Part_12072_8793811.1166451405277--
>
