On the 0x245 day of Apache Harmony Salikh Zakirov wrote:
> Morozova, Nadezhda wrote:
> > Hi all,
> > I've tried to incorporate your feedback about the changed menu. The
> > latest version is at my sandbox [1].
> > Does anybody object to merging the sandbox with the site?
>
> I guess you still couldn't get over that "reorganize everything" syndrome :)
>
> Nits and picks:
>
> - Why did you move "wiki" link from "Community" section into "Development"?
> It confuses me.
me too, even in the "Documentation" section it looks more natural
> - Why did you moved the "Get Involved" link after "Who we are"?
> I think the original order ("Get Involved" first and "Committers"/"Who we are"
> then) was better.
We have:
Community
* Get Involved
* Committers
* Mailing Lists
* Documentation
* FAQ
* Wiki
Nadya is proposing:
Community
* Who We are
* Get Involved
* Bug Tracker
* Mailing Lists
// Nadya, thanks for moving the FAQ higher
Famous Apache HTTP Server website [255] has:
Get Ivolved
* Mailing Lists
* Bug Reports
* Developer Info
I see no reasons to reinvent the wheel and would have chosen the
following strategy to the site reorg:
1. do as close to [255] as possible
2. Dislikes? -> Discuss!
That promises to be a faster convergence.
[255] http://httpd.apache.org/
> - Where is the content of "Project Guidelines" now? I could not find the link
> by scanning the navigation pane
> (Okay, I've found it later by extensive search under "Who we are", which
> suggests that "who we are" is a badly chosen name for the page)
>
> I would suggest that you propose logically separated changes one by one,
> rather than submitting wholesale reorganization, because for sure there will
> be someone opposing some of the changes
> (in this particular case it is me).
>
> The separated changes that I would put +1 for are:
>
> + adding site map
> + cleaning and reorganizing "Documentation" (former "Subcomponents") section
> of
> the navigation pane
> + updating outdated pages
>
>
--
Egor Pasko
