I think we should file it as JIRA in Yoko. Relying on private(!) field (even if this field exist only in Harmony :-)) looks inapproprite to me.
Regards, Mikhail On 12/22/06, Zakharov, Vasily M <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi, all, I was checking the output from HARMONY-2615 <http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HARMONY-2615> stress test, and found a couple of issues with Yoko. org.apache.yoko.rmi.util.ClassLoaderLocal class contains the following line in its static initializer: classes_vector = ClassLoader.class.getDeclaredField("classes"); This line references the classes field in class java.lang.ClassLoader, and that field is not documented by RI API JavaDoc and so is absent in Harmony classlib. As the result of this issue, the classes org.apache.yoko.rmi.util.ClassLoaderLocal and org.apache.yoko.rmi.impl.PortableRemoteObjectExtImpl fail to load with NoSuchFieldException. I'm not sure what should be done to this issue. Should we file it to Yoko JIRA as "strong bond to RI"? Or should we add the field mentioned to Harmony classlib? :) Vasily Zakharov Intel Enterprise Solutions Software Division
