Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
On Dec 28, 2006, at 12:54 AM, Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
I've been thinking a little bit about our alert messages, and
1) I think that each system that's submitting should have an assigned
ID, so it's easy to figure out who is what. It can be as easy as
self-assignment on the wiki registration page. Just take the next
integer. I put these up on the system list on the wiki.
2) I'd like to have a "sequence number" for each message, and then a
reference sequence number for "BUILD FIXED" messages, to make it
easier to figure out which break was fixed (for CC systems that are
running multiple things). This may be a pita, though, as it's
stateful. But it's already stateful, I guess.
3) How about basic machine-readable formatting? Maybe something like
the message body be a combination of a meta data header and then the
current blob of stuff we currently have.
So :
<info>
<systemid>1</systemid>
<status>FIXED</status>
<sequence>102031</sequence>
<reference>102030</sequence>
actually, we should put everything in there - platform, OS, tool info,
etc....
+1
I support the idea of identifying alert messages and pair them in
broken-fixed pairs. This would make the understanding of the current
state by platform much more convenient.
--
Gregory
