On the 0x259 day of Apache Harmony Elena Semukhina wrote: > It was me who removed stress.Mix from the exclude lists together with some > more tests because all they passed for me even when running many times on > Windows 2003, SUSE9 linux ia32, and SUSE9 linux em64t. It was at the end of > November. > > CC started failing intermittently on stress.Mix (SUSE9, em64t) on December, > 18 and was excluded for that platform (HARMONY-2772). > > stress.Mix still passes for me now on SUSE9 linux ia32 and em64t (both are > 2xXeon x64 machines) while megaSpawn crashes with Segmentation fault on > em64t and hangs on ia32 after printing a lot of messages like the following: > java.lang.OutOfMemoryError: Failed to create new thread
Good test then.. Thanks, Weldon! > Thanks, > Elena > > On 1/9/07, Weldon Washburn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > On 1/8/07, Geir Magnusson Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > On Jan 8, 2007, at 1:20 PM, Weldon Washburn wrote: > > > > > > > On 1/8/07, Rana Dasgupta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > >> > > > >> On 1/7/07, Geir Magnusson Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > >> > > > > >> > >What is in the backlog? > > > >> > > > > >> > >I was testing on em64t dual core, and it failed there too. > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> Which one failed in 64 bit mode? The basic stress.Mix or Weldon's > > > >> MegaSpawn? > > > >> And did it hang, or run out of memory? Running out of memory on > > > >> these 64 > > > >> bit > > > >> systems is not easy even under the conditions of this test. > > > >> > > > >> >I think we broke something basic. By just ignoring it and > > > >> continuing > > > >> > >with commits that are related, it seems like we're going going > > > >> to get > > > >> > >in deeper trouble... > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> I am a little confused too. The stress.Mix test can randomly land > > > >> up doing > > > >> unbounded thread creation( as in Weldon's repro case )...and I > > > >> would think > > > >> that it is not unreasonable to fail in such a case. The RI fails > > > >> too. But > > > >> I > > > >> don't understand how it never failed before. > > > >> > > > >> > > > > I attempted to determine if there ever was an old svn revision that > > > > would > > > > pass stress.Mix test on my rhel 2-way SMP box. Unfortunately the > > > > unified > > > > classlib/vm build changed the how one gets an old revision from the > > > > repository. I don't know if its worth trying to resurect an old svn > > > > revision. I am hoping someone will confirm if stress.Mix ever ran > > > > successfully on 2-way and 4-way boxes. This seems way easier than > > > > trying to > > > > reconstruct old build.xml files. > > > > > > Huh? > > > > > > Why do you think you need to reconstruct anything? > > > > > > Its a moot point. Naveen got the answers for us already. > > > > geir > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > Weldon Washburn > > Intel Enterprise Solutions Software Division > > > > > > > -- > Thanks, > Elena -- Egor Pasko
