Thanks guys!
HARMONY-2971 was filed to record this non bug difference from RI.
On 1/10/07, Alexei Zakharov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> "If this SerialBlob is instantiated with a byte array, a SerialException
> is thrown."
> So I say throw the SerialException.
+1 from me.
Regards,
2007/1/8, Tim Ellison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> The main JavaDoc description seems quite clear to me:
> "If this SerialBlob is instantiated with a byte array, a SerialException
> is thrown."
>
> So I say throw the SerialException.
>
> Regards,
> Tim
>
> Andrew Zhang wrote:
> > Hi guys,
> >
> > sorry, SerialBlob compatibility problem again. It's the last
unimplemented
> > method of SerialBlob, setBinaryStream(long pos). The spec says "throws
> > SerialException - if the SerialBlob in not instantiated with a Blob
object
> > that supports setBinaryStream()". What should happen if the
SerialBlob is
> > instantiated with a byte buffer? As my understanding, it should throw
> > SerialException, but I feel the spec is a little ambiguous, is it? I
need
> > native speakers' help. :-) Anyway, I think throws SerialException
sounds
> > reasonable to me if it's instantiated with a byte buffer. But RI
throws
> > NullPointerException instead. Following test shows the problem:
> > public void testSetBinaryStreamJ() throws Exception {
> > byte[] buf = { 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 };
> > SerialBlob serialBlob = new SerialBlob(buf);
> > serialBlob.setBinaryStream(1);
> > }
> > Shall we follow RI or throw SerialException? Thanks!
--
Alexei Zakharov,
Intel ESSD
--
Best regards,
Andrew Zhang
