On Jan 26, 2007, at 1:06 AM, Stepan Mishura wrote:
Hi,
Currently I'm experimenting with HARMONY-2655: [buildtest][cc]
iterative
classlib tests runs incorporating.
It introduce new acronym for build-and-test infra - HUT (Harmony Unit
Tests).
Does anybody have allergy on acronyms? (I know that Geir dislikes
'HY')
HUT makes sense to me, because it's an acronym. HY never did,
because it isn't.
If you followed the "HY" pattern, you'd call the HUT a HYUTTS.
geir
Thanks,
Stepan Mishura
Intel Enterprise Solutions Software Division
