On Jan 29, 2007, at 10:34 AM, Alexei Zakharov wrote:
Hi Alex,
(I hope I am not duplicating Geir's work)
Nope - thanks for taking care of it.
I've just committed the
changes you suggested in HARMONY-2957. However, I didn't add your jar
file because I'm not sure that placing a jar file in the module's root
is a good idea. IMHO it would be better to create some sort of README
in the module's root where the correct sequence of actions is
described. Something about how this file can be created or what else
can / should be done to simplify the eclipse user's life.
To all: by doing this I don't assume that talks about pack200 module
are finalized. I just believe that it is still better to let the code
evolve in its current location than to stop applying any patches at
all (that can completely demotive contributor(s) - i.e. Alex). While
we are thinking I mean.
With Best Regards,
2007/1/24, Alexei Zakharov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
It was in my TODO list for tomorrow, but please take it if you like.
Regards,
2007/1/24, Geir Magnusson Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> sorry about the delay - I'll look into it later if no one beats
me to it
>
> On Jan 24, 2007, at 12:32 PM, Alex Blewitt wrote:
>
> > Not that I'm going out of my way to be repetitive, but this
has been
> > in the queue for a couple of weeks now. Is anyone going to be
able to
> > apply it in the near future, or is that just wishful thinking
on my
> > part?
> >
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HARMONY-2957
> >
> > Alex
> >
> > On 19/01/07, Alex Blewitt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> It would be good if someone could apply Harmony-2957 seeing
as Nathan
> >> has just reassigned it. That way, I can get on with the next
stage
> >> with the pack200 stuff :-)
> >>
> >> Thanks,
--
Alexei Zakharov,
Intel ESSD
