2007/1/29, Geir Magnusson Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
On Jan 29, 2007, at 12:53 PM, Alexey Petrenko wrote: > 2007/1/23, Tim Ellison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >> Alexey Petrenko wrote: >> > 2007/1/17, Geir Magnusson Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >> >> so what do we do? I'm hoping that we can find a way to achieve >> this >> >> w/o us having to have "shadow" or duplicate code here... >> > That would be great. Can you suggest something? >> >> As Alexey wrote, the level of CORBA support in the RI 5.0 [1] is >> predominantly 2.3.1 based. However, we are free to implement a later >> version of the Corba spec and still be compliant since the CORBA >> code is >> an "endorsed standard" (see [2]). > Thanks, Tim, for finding this. > > From the other hand Java 5 SE API docs has a license [1] which says > the following: > Sun also grants you a perpetual, non-exclusive, worldwide, fully > paid-up, royalty free, limited license (without the right to > sublicense) under any applicable copyrights or patent rights it may > have in the Specification to create and/or distribute an Independent > Implementation of the Specification that: (i) fully implements the > Spec(s) including all its required interfaces and functionality That's not in conflict, as the spec gives us this ability to substitute in this case. IOW, we still fully implement the spec.
Probably so... SY, Alexey
