I was wondering if mirroring the classlib/trunk would be ok?

On 1/30/07, Geir Magnusson Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

On Jan 30, 2007, at 7:53 AM, Pavel Pervov wrote:

> On 1/29/07, Mark Hindess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 29 January 2007 at 20:25, "Geir Magnusson Jr." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> wrote:
>> >
>> > On Jan 29, 2007, at 5:09 PM, Pavel Pervov wrote:
>> >
>> > > Both 'svn update' in checked out harmony tree and 'svn co
>> > > http(s)://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/harmony<https://
>> svn.apache.org/
>> > > repos/asf/harmony>'
>> > > produce the following:
>> > >
>> > > svn: REPORT request failed on '/repos/asf/!svn/vcc/default'
>> > > svn: REPORT of '/repos/asf/!svn/vcc/default': 400 Bad Request (
>> > > http://svn.apache.org)
>> > > Checking out any of harmony subdirectories works just fine.
>> > >
>> > > Where can I try to find the cause of this?
>> >
>> > It was shut down because people were doing that.  There's very few
>> > reasons to ever get the head like that, and it places incredible
>> > stress on the servers - apparently it was happening quite a bit.
>> >
>> > I meant to put a note on the website about it.
>> >
>> > geir
>>
>> Geir,
>>
>> I've been maintaining an internal mirror of the complete
>> repository with
>> svk - for various reasons.  I usually update it every other day.
>> I'm no
>> longer able to do this.  I hope this has not caused a problem?  Is it
>> preferable to maintain mirrors of each sub-project separately - I
>> would
>> have thought this would generate more load on the server not less?
>>
>> Regards,
>> Mark.
>>
>>
>>
> Me too, actually, but under GIT. Any ideas?
> P.S. I can check out and update subtrees and root files separately
> though...

I'll try and figure out how bad the problem was.  Once a day doesn't
sound bad, but I got the sense it was far worse.  Maybe someone is
over-reacting, but I know Joe, and he's fairly deliberate, careful
and pragmatic.

geir

> --
> Pavel Pervov,
> Intel Enterprise Solutions Software Division




--
Tony Wu
China Software Development Lab, IBM

Reply via email to